Mohamed Teleb, M. A., M. G. Kamel, H. A. Ead, H. M. Hassaneen, and F. M. Saleh,
Reactivity of N-(4-Nitrophenyl) propionohydrazonoyl Bromide. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Study of Thiadiazoles and 4, 6-Dithia-1, 2, 9-triazaspiro-[4.4]-non-2-en-8-ones,
, vol. 43, issue 1: Taylor & Francis, pp. 572 - 585, 2023.
Abstractn/a
for and on Surgery, N. I. H. C. R. G. H. R. U. G.,
Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries,
, pp. znad092, 2023/04/20.
AbstractHealthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres.This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries.In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia.This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries.The effects of climate change need urgent action. Most countries and organizations have made commitments to reduce carbon. Healthcare, and especially surgery, is responsible for producing a large amount of carbon and for other behaviours that are harmful to the environment. The aim of this study was to identify the most practical and safe interventions to make surgery more environmentally friendly. Interventions to achieve green surgery were found in the literature and added to a list. The list was ordered and shortened, following advice of doctors and patients. The safest and most practical interventions were at the top. The top three areas for change were to reduce the use of one-use items and energy, recycle, and manage waste appropriately. There are several ways that we can make surgery greener. The list produced gives us practical examples of what can be done.
Amin, O., O. Shaalan, and M. Riad,
"Remineralization Potential of Curodont Repair Flouride Plus Versus CPP-ACP in White Spot Lesions",
Advanced Dental Journal, vol. 5, issue 1, no. 1, pp. 110–118, jan, 2023.
AbstractObjectives: To compare the remineralization potential of Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus Versus CPP -ACP in management of white spot lesions.
Methodology: 48 white spot lesions in patients received randomly two types of remineralizing agents, either Curodont Repair Flouride Plus (self-assembling peptide p11-4) or MI paste daily use, both materials were applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions. White spot lesions were evaluated before and after 1, 4, and 6 months follow up periods by assessors to assess remineralization potential using ICDAS II Criteria and digital photographs using analysis software to get the percentage of white spot lesions. Results: According to ICDAS II, intergroup comparison between both materials have shown no statistically significant difference, Intragroup comparisons within Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus have shown statistically significant difference between different follow-up periods (P < 0.0001). Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus had 25% less risk for (ICDAS 1and 2) than CPP-ACP after 6 months (RR= 0.75, 95% CI, P=0.2498). According to the photographic analysis, Two-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant effect of material and follow-up on WSL % (P<0.001). Conclusions: Curodont Repair Flouride Plus is a biomimetic remineralizing agent that provides a therapeutic option for enamel regeneration. Curodont repair fluoride plus provided a better chance for complete healing of incipient lesions.