Amr Taha

With the advancement in endoscopic surgery, radiation treatment planning and execution, as well as the use of new chemotherapeutic regimens, bladder conservation has evolved into a competing alternative to radical cystectomy. Trimodality treatment has the great advantage of preserving a normally functioning urinary bladder. Despite the absence of direct randomized trials comparing both modalities, trimodality treatment comprising maximal transuretheral resection of bladder tumors followed by different regimens of combined radiochemotherapy achieved comparable results to radical cystectomy in many trials. Those who did not achieve complete remission after induction radiochemotherapy were salvaged by radical cystectomy. Improving the radiotherapeutic window is a challenging issue. In radiotherapy for bladder cancer, uncertainties include set-up errors, patient movement, internal organ movement and volume changes due to bladder filling (both inter- and intrafraction). The advancement in treatment verification procedures in modern radiotherapy and the use of fiducial markers reduces set-up errors, while adaptive radiotherapy could decrease the unnecessary irradiation of normal tissues by tracking bladder volume changes. In addition, new radiotherapeutic techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volume-modulated radiotherapy, permit dose escalation to the target without increasing the dose to the surrounding normal tissues.

BACKGROUND: The pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) outcome remains dismal despite multiple therapeutic attempts.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of treatment of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) using hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one newly diagnosed DIPG children were randomized into hypofractionated (HF) (39Gy/13 fractions in 2.6weeks) and conventional (CF) arm (54Gy/30 fractions in 6weeks).

RESULTS: The median and one-year overall survival (OS) was 7.8months and 36.4±8.2% for the hypofractionated arm, and 9.5 and 26.2±7.4% for the conventional arm respectively. The 18-month OS difference was 2.2%. The OS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.70-1.89) (p=0.59). The hypofractionated arm had a median and one-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.6months and 22.5±7.1%, compared to 7.3 and 17.9±7.1% for the conventional arm. The PFS HR was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.67-1.90) (p=0.71). The 18-month PFS difference was 1.1%. These differences exceed the non-inferiority margin. The immediate and delayed side effects were not different in the 2 arms.

CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated radiotherapy offers lesser burden on the patients, their families and the treating departments, with nearly comparable results to conventional fractionation, though not fulfilling the non-inferiority assumption.

AIM: To compare the accuracy of radiotherapy set-up using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) versus megavoltage cone beam computed tomography (MV-CBCT) in paediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 204 pairs of EPID and MV-CBCT were carried out for 72 patients in the first 3 treatment days and weekly thereafter.

RESULTS: For the whole group, the mean systematic EPID set-up errors were 1.8 (±1.7), 1.6 (±1.3), 1.4 (±1.5) mm and 2.3 (±1.7), 1.6 (±1.3), 2.4 (±1.6) mm for MV-CBCT in the longitudinal, lateral and vertical directions, respectively, whereas the mean EPID random errors were 2.0 (±1.7), 1.4 (±1.5), 1.2 (±1.6) and 1.9 (±1.5), 1.5 (±1.3), 2.1 (±1.7) mm for MV-CBCT in the longitudinal, lateral and vertical directions, respectively. For systematic errors of head and neck patients, there was a statistically significant difference in the lateral and vertical directions (P=0.027, 0.003), whereas in the non-head and neck patients there was a statistically significant difference in the lateral direction only (P=0.031). In head and neck patients, the mean random errors were significantly different in the vertical and lateral directions, whereas in non-head and neck patients, they were significantly different in the vertical direction only. The larger values alternate between the two modalities. The systematic and random errors (detected by EPID and MV-CBCT) were significantly correlated in almost all direction in all tumour sites.

CONCLUSIONS: The comparison between set-up error in EPID and MV-CBCT was not in favour of any of the two modalities. However, the two modalities were strongly correlated but fairly agreed and the differences between the shifts reported were small and hardly influenced the recommended planning target volume margin.

BACKGROUND: The pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) outcome remains dismal despite multiple therapeutic attempts.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of treatment of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) using hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one newly diagnosed DIPG children were randomized into hypofractionated (HF) (39Gy/13 fractions in 2.6weeks) and conventional (CF) arm (54Gy/30 fractions in 6weeks).

RESULTS: The median and one-year overall survival (OS) was 7.8months and 36.4±8.2% for the hypofractionated arm, and 9.5 and 26.2±7.4% for the conventional arm respectively. The 18-month OS difference was 2.2%. The OS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.70-1.89) (p=0.59). The hypofractionated arm had a median and one-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.6months and 22.5±7.1%, compared to 7.3 and 17.9±7.1% for the conventional arm. The PFS HR was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.67-1.90) (p=0.71). The 18-month PFS difference was 1.1%. These differences exceed the non-inferiority margin. The immediate and delayed side effects were not different in the 2 arms.

CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated radiotherapy offers lesser burden on the patients, their families and the treating departments, with nearly comparable results to conventional fractionation, though not fulfilling the non-inferiority assumption.