@article {205700, title = {Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of deferiprone compared with deferasirox in paediatric patients with transfusion-dependent haemoglobinopathies (DEEP-2): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.}, journal = {The Lancet. Haematology}, volume = {7}, year = {2020}, pages = {e469-e478}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-dependent haemoglobinopathies require lifelong iron chelation therapy with one of the three iron chelators (deferiprone, deferasirox, or deferoxamine). Deferasirox and deferiprone are the only two oral chelators used in adult patients with transfusion-dependent haemoglobinopathies. To our knowledge, there are no randomised clinical trials comparing deferiprone, a less expensive iron chelator, with deferasirox in paediatric patients. We aimed to show the non-inferiority of deferiprone versus deferasirox.

METHODS: DEEP-2 was a phase 3, multicentre, randomised trial in paediatric patients (aged 1 month to 18 years) with transfusion-dependent haemoglobinopathies. The study was done in 21 research hospitals and universities in Italy, Egypt, Greece, Albania, Cyprus, Tunisia, and the UK. Participants were receiving at least 150 mL/kg per year of red blood cells for the past 2 years at the time of enrolment, and were receiving deferoxamine (\<100 mg/kg per day) or deferasirox (\<40 mg/kg per day; deferasirox is not registered for use in children aged \<2 years so only deferoxamine was being used in these patients). Any previous chelation treatment was permitted with a 7-day washout period. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive orally administered daily deferiprone (75-100 mg/kg per day) or daily deferasirox (20-40 mg/kg per day) administered as dispersible tablets, both with dose adjustment for 12 months, stratified by age (\<10 years and >=10 years) and balanced by country. The primary efficacy endpoint was based on predefined success criteria for changes in serum ferritin concentration (all patients) and cardiac MRI T2-star (T2*; patients aged \>10 years) to show non-inferiority of deferiprone versus deferasirox in the per-protocol population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who received the study drugs and had available data for both variables at baseline and after 1 year of treatment, without major protocol violations. Non-inferiority was based on the two-sided 95\% CI of the difference in the proportion of patients with treatment success between the two groups and was shown if the lower limit of the two-sided 95\% CI was greater than -12{\textperiodcentered}5\%. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2012-000353-31, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01825512.

FINDINGS: 435 patients were enrolled between March 17, 2014, and June 16, 2016, 393 of whom were randomly assigned to a treatment group (194 to the deferiprone group; 199 to the deferasirox group). 352 (90\%) of 390 patients had β-thalassaemia major, 27 (7\%) had sickle cell disease, five (1\%) had thalassodrepanocytosis, and six (2\%) had other haemoglobinopathies. Median follow-up was 379 days (IQR 294-392) for deferiprone and 381 days (350-392) for deferasirox. Non-inferiority of deferiprone versus deferasirox was established (treatment success in 69 [55{\textperiodcentered}2\%] of 125 patients assigned deferiprone with primary composite efficacy endpoint data available at baseline and 1 year vs 80 [54{\textperiodcentered}8\%] of 146 assigned deferasirox, difference 0{\textperiodcentered}4\%; 95\% CI -11{\textperiodcentered}9 to 12{\textperiodcentered}6). No significant difference between the groups was shown in the occurrence of serious and drug-related adverse events. Three (2\%) cases of reversible agranulocytosis occurred in the 193 patients in the safety analysis in the deferiprone group and two (1\%) cases of reversible renal and urinary disorders (one case of each) occurred in the 197 patients in the deferasirox group. Compliance was similar between treatment groups: 183 (95\%) of 193 patients in the deferiprone group versus 192 (97\%) of 197 patients in the deferisirox group.

INTERPRETATION: In paediatric patients with transfusion-dependent haemoglobinopathies, deferiprone was effective and safe in inducing control of iron overload during 12 months of treatment. Considering the need for availability of more chelation treatments in paediatric populations, deferiprone offers a valuable treatment option for this age group.

FUNDING: EU Seventh Framework Programme.

}, author = {Maggio, Aurelio and Antonis Kattamis and Felisi, Mariagrazia and Reggiardo, Giorgio and Amal El-Beshlawy and Bejaoui, Mohamed and Sherief, Laila and Christou, Soteroula and Cosmi, Carlo and Della Pasqua, Oscar and Del Vecchio, Giovanni Carlo and Filosa, Aldo and Cuccia, Liana and Hoda Hassab and Kreka, Manika and Origa, Raffaella and Putti, Maria Caterina and Spino, Michael and Telfer, Paul and Tempesta, Bianca and Vitrano, Angela and Tsang, Yu Chung and Zaka, Ariana and Tricta, Fernando and Bonifazi, Donato and Ceci, Adriana} }