@article {145766, title = {Evaluation and Impact of Workflow Interruptions During Robot-assisted Surgery.}, journal = {Urology}, volume = {92}, year = {2016}, note = {n/a}, month = {2016 Jun}, pages = {33-7}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and categorize causes for interruptions during robot-assisted surgery.

METHODS: We analyzed 10 robot-assisted prostatectomies that were performed by 3 surgeons from October 2014 to June 2015. Interruptions to surgery were defined in terms of duration, stage of surgery, personnel involved, reasons, and impact of the interruption on the surgical workflow.

RESULTS: The main reasons for interruptions included the following: console surgeons switching (29\%); preparation of the surgical equipment, such as cleaning or changing the camera (29\%) or an instrument (27\%); or when a suture, stapler, or clip was needed (12\%). The most common interruption duration was 10-29 seconds (47.6\%), and the least common interruption duration was greater than 90 seconds (3.6\%). Additionally, about 14\% of the interruptions were considered avoidable, whereas the remaining 86\% of interruptions were necessary for surgery.

CONCLUSION: By identifying and analyzing interruptions, we can develop evidence-based strategies to improve operating room efficiency, lower costs, and advance patient safety.

}, keywords = {Humans, Male, Prostatectomy, Retrospective Studies, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Workflow}, issn = {1527-9995}, doi = {10.1111/bju.13934}, author = {Allers, Jenna C and Hussein, Ahmed A and Ahmad, Nabeeha and Cavuoto, Lora and Wing, Joseph F and Hayes, Robin M and Hinata, Nobuyuki and Bisantz, Ann M and Guru, Khurshid A} }