Eldarir, S. A., Hanan A. El Sebaae, H. E. A. Feky, H. A. Hussien, N. A. E. Fadi, and I. E. H. Shaeer,
"An Introduction of OSCE versus Traditional Method in Nursing Education: Faculty Capacity Building & Students’ Perspectives",
Journal of American Science, vol. Vol. 6, issue No. 12و December 1, , 2010.
AbstractBackground: Assessment of clinical competence is of great importance when evaluating the expected learning outcomes of nursing education. Increasing number of students enrolled at Egyptian nursing faculties might increase the chances of malpractice that compromise patients’ conditions. Therefore it is challenging to have such an objective assessment tool to comprehensively assess students’ clinical competencies especially with increased students’ number. Aims of the current project are building capacity of nursing faculties and staff members for OSCE; establishing simulated learning experiences (OSCE) in nursing practice; comparing the feasibility, utility, and effectiveness of using OSCE versus traditional clinical assessment; examining faculty and students perspectives for OSCE; and evaluating the effectiveness of OSCE versus traditional clinical assessment. Method: To achieve aims of this study needs’ assessment of faculty members were carried out during conduction of raising awareness seminar about OSCE which attended by 72 faculty and staff members from both Cairo and Ain Shams Universities. A total of 7 workshops were held to build up their capacities on the scheme of OSCE and clinical scenario writings .One-hundred and forty faculty and staff members were attended and pre-post tests a were administered. Out of the 140, 31 were trained as data collectors. Implementation of the OSCE was carried out on 400 second and third year students at the areas of critical care units. Comparison of students' achievements at traditional and OSCE methods were carried out. Faculty’s and students’ perspectives were investigated. Results: Needs’ assessment revealed that 57% of faculty members knew nothing about OSCE and 98.6% of them had no experience in using OSCE; also a high statistical significant differences between OSCE and traditional assessment groups in the first and second trial (t=2.423, p=0.016), and (t= 6.23, p= 0.000) respectively. The students' achievements were better with OSCE. Faculty staff members indicated that, OSCE saves time (76.3%) prepares highly qualified competent students (62.5%) and improve students’ performance (62.5%). Conclusion OSCE examination offers an attractive option for assessment of students’ competency. It provided particular strengths in terms of faculty staff objectivity and reliability of the assessment process for all students, especially when compared with other methods of assessing practice.
Keywords: Assessment, OSCE, traditional method, Faculty capacity building, students’ perspectives