Osama Hussein

Background: Although community pharmacists have been actively engaged in patient care, their role in deprescribing is still restricted. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new educational approach designed to catalyze deprescribing in community pharmacies. Methods: In this 4-month, randomized, controlled trial, 108 community pharmacies in Egypt were randomly and equally distributed to either the active or the control groups. Participants from the active group pharmacies received 31 deprescribing-related clinical case scenarios, designed according to the available deprescribing guideline and clinical experiences of an expert panel members, and delivered through WhatsApp. Then participants from both groups reported the incidence of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs), the frequency of deprescribing opportunities, and related pharmacist interventions. Results: Pharmacists from the active group reported a considerably higher incidence of PIMs (20.87%) than that reported by pharmacists from the control group (5.03%). In addition, they made 1326 deprescribing-related interventions, of which 1022 (77.07%) were accepted and 641 (48.34%) were significant interventions. The proportions of cessation of drug therapy, reducing the dose, and persuasion of patients to accept deprescribing pharmacist interventions in the active group were 37.85%, 22.09%, and 10.63%, respectively. In contrast, 150 of 268 deprescribing-related interventions (55.97%) in the active group were accepted. The clinical value and type of deprescribing decision were statistically significant determinants for the acceptance of deprescribing decisions. The mean time needed to persuade the patient about deprescribing and the cost saved per patient across the active and the control groups were 5.09 ± 3.54 minutes versus 10.03 ± 6.19 minutes and 17.88 ± 9.60 U.S. dollars versus 4.49 ± 2.44 U.S. dollars, respectively. Conclusion: The intervention proposed improved the frequency and clinical value of deprescribing decisions.

Background: Community pharmacists have the responsibilities of identifying and resolving medication-related problems (MRPs), thereby improving patient safety. Objectives: To deliver a series of clinical case scenarios using WhatsApp and assess the impact of this method on the ability of pharmacists to identify MRPs. Methods: This study was conducted in 104 community pharmacies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) over a period of six months. Recruited pharmacies were randomly allocated to either intervention or control groups using a 1:1 allocation ratio. Senior experts in clinical pharmacy created a series of clinical case scenarios based on their clinical practice and based on previous published studies related to MRPs. WhatsApp®, a well-known messenger application, which has been proven to be an efficient platform to improve communication between learners and educators, was used to deliver clinical scenarios-based educational interventions to pharmacists. Then, pharmacists from both groups filled a standardized data reporting form. The clinical importance of pharmacist recommendations was assessed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Results: The total number of patients with MRPs across the intervention and control groups was 492 versus 194 (p = 0.01). While the number of MRPs identified, the mean time needed to resolve MRPs for patients with major polypharmacy, and physicians' acceptance of pharmacist recommendations across the intervention and control groups were 492 versus 194, 1589 versus 255, 6.82 (±3.86) versus 10.78 (±6.38), and 1065/1284 (82.94%) versus 125/201 (62.18%), respectively, all with p < 0.05. Efficacy-related problems (27.56%) and safety-related problems (28.44%) were the most commonly identified MRPs by pharmacists in the intervention group. Clinically significance of pharmacist recommendations was a significant predictive factor for physicians' acceptance of pharmacist recommendations. Conclusion: Clinical case scenarios delivered by WhatsApp may be useful for improving the ability of pharmacists to identify MRPs and for shortening the mean time needed to resolve MRPs.

Background: While the role of pharmacists in the current pandemic control has been recognized worldwide, their coaching efforts to improve public's behaviors that could prevent COVID-19 transmission has been rarely investigated. Objectives: To assess whether pharmacist-based virtual health coaching sessions could increase the proportion of people who practised healthy social behaviors, to test whether this model can increase the public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines, and to measure whether these behaviors could actually prevent contracting COVID-19. Method: In this randomized controlled trial, adults who matched specific criteria were randomly allocated into 2 arms. The active arm received 12 pharmacist-based virtual coaching sessions delivered via Zoom® over a month. Participants allocated to the control arm received no coaching. At the end of the last coaching session, both groups were asked to complete a structured questionnaire for outcome assessment. Participants in the active group were followed up to 2 weeks after the end of the last coaching session to check if they contracted COVID-19 or not. The SPSS software version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 300 participants who gave consent for participation, 295 completed the study (147 from the active arm and 148 from the control arm). The proportion of those using face masks, avoiding crowds, and willing to be isolated if infected in the active arm was increased from 51.70%, 53.74%, and 59.86% at baseline to 91.83%, 80.27%, and 96.59% at the end of coaching, respectively (all with P <.05). In addition, the proportion of behaviors, such as disinfecting surfaces, not touching the T-zone, and avoid sharing personal belongings with colleagues at work was increased from 36.05%, 27.89%, and 46.93% at baseline to 63.94%, 52.38%, and 87.75% at the end of coaching, respectively (all with P <.05). Avoid touching the T-zone (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89) and using disposable tissues (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.77), each versus using face masks appropriately were more likely to get COVID-19. Conclusion: Pharmacist-based virtual health coaching could be a potential strategy to increase the proportion of behaviors that could curtail the spread of COVID-19.

Background: Warfarin is widely regarded as the main anticoagulant in lowering the risk of thromboembolism. This study used indicators to compare pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services, using a well-prepared protocol, with physician-managed anticoagulation services. Methods: A retrospective prospective pilot study was conducted to compare patient outcomes before and after transitioning patients to pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services, comparing the proportion of those with therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR), subtherapeutic INR, and supratherapeutic INR, as well as their bleeding occurrences as indicators of assuring quality care. Results: A significant improvement in anticoagulation management was noted in the transition to pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services. The proportion of those with subtherapeutic INR decreased from 61.8% to 11.8% (p < 0.001), those with supratherapeutic INR decreased from 20.6% to 2.9% (p < 0.001), those with therapeutic INR increased from 17.6% to 85.3% (p < 0.001), and the occurrence of bleeding decreased from 11.8% to 0.0%, without significant difference in warfarin doses (median from 4 before the transition to 5 after); in addition, the time to reach therapeutic INR decreased from 12-24 weeks to 2-8 weeks after transitioning to pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services. Conclusion: Pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services are considered safer and more effective than physician-managed anticoagulation services alone in terms of patients' adherence and satisfaction, which provide an excellent opportunity for quality assurance care.