Moustafa, A., Imaging of pregnancy associated breast cancer: Sudanese experience, : European Congress of Radiology 2015, 2015. Abstract
n/a
Moustafa, A., Sono-mammographic findings of Mondors disease of the breast, : European Congress of Radiology 2015, 2015. Abstract
n/a
Moustafa, A., Sonomammographic evaluation of circumscribed giant solid breast masses, : European Congress of Radiology 2015, 2015. Abstract
n/a
Moustafa, A., O. Mohammed Shetat, M. Said El-Azab, M. M. Gomaa, M. Alabrak, and H. Fadl, "Lactational breast changes/lobular hyperplasia mimicking masses: how can we differentiate from true pathological masses?", Kasr Al Ainy Medical Journal, vol. 22, issue 2: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, pp. 41-48, May 1, 2016. AbstractWebsite

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the role of sonomammography in the characterization of clinically palpable breast masses during pregnancy and lactation with differentiation of true and false (lobular hyperplasia/lactational changes) masses.Materials and methodsOne hundred patients with clinically palpable breast masses during pregnancy and lactation were evaluated by means of ultrasound (US). Mammography was performed only for 23 patients. Mammographic and sonographic findings were evaluated retrospectively. When US or mammography revealed a benign lesion, no further diagnostic evaluation was necessary. However, when US or mammography demonstrated a suspicious lesion, biopsy was performed.ResultsUS showed lobular hyperplasia/lactational breast changes categorized as Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 2 (BI-RADS 2) in 13 cases, a lesion with the criteria of benignity categorized as BI-RADS 2 in four cases, BI-RADS 3 in 68 cases, BI-RADS 4 in three cases, and BI-RADS 5 in 12 cases. Mammography showed normal dense breast categorized as BI-RADS 1 in four cases, lesions with criteria of benignity categorized as BI-RADS 3 in six cases, BI-RADS 4 in two cases, and BI-RADS 5 in 11 cases. Trucut biopsy established the pathological diagnosis in 22 cases.ConclusionMost of the pregnancy-associated breast masses are benign. Nevertheless, a strict assessment of any lesion is required, to exclude malignancy and to rule out lactational breast changes/lobular hyperplasia that may present as lump. US is the most appropriate radiologic method for evaluating breast disorders in women during pregnancy and lactation.

ELSAID, N. O. H. A. A. B. D. E. L. S. H. A. F. Y., S. Farouk, O. M. M. Shetat, N. M. Khalifa, and O. M. Nada, Contrast enhanced digital mammography: Is it useful in detecting lesions in edematous breast?, , vol. 46, issue 3, pp. 811 - 819, 2015. AbstractWebsite

IntroductionBreast edema can be caused by a variety of pathologic processes of benign or malignant diseases. Contrast enhanced digital mammogram (CEDM) has been shown to improve the probability of malignancy detection when compared with the conventional mammography alone.
Patients and methods
This study was prospectively carried on 34 female patients with breast edema at the female imaging unit of the Radiology Department. The age range was 29–80years. Bilateral conventional mammography (MX) and contrast-enhanced digital mammographic procedure (CEDM) were performed in approximately 7–10min and followed by complementary ultrasound (US).
Results
As regards enhancement patterns in our study, noncontrast uptake and diffuse parenchymal uptake were considered as benign and intense contrast uptake is considered malignant and ring enhancement in keeping with both benign and malignant lesions. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography were 95%, and 73% respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88%.
Conclusion
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography is a useful technique in identification of lesions in mammographically dense edematous breasts and proved to be a useful tool in the follow-up of cases presenting by edema after conservative breast surgery and chemotherapy.

Tourism