ElMelhat, A. M., R. L. Abbas, M. R. Zebdawi, and ali mohamed ali ismail, "Effect of adding thoracic manipulation for the management of patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized clinical trial.", Physiotherapy theory and practice, vol. 41, issue 1, pp. 65-78, 2025 Jan. Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research is supporting thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) as an intervention in treating adhesive capsulitis (AC) when coupled with physical therapy interventions.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether TSM improves AC outcomes when combined with physical therapy interventions.

METHOD: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial with 40 patients assigned into two groups. The experimental group (EG) received physical therapy intervention and TSM; the control group (CG) had physical therapy with sham manipulation. Both groups received interventions biweekly for 12 weeks. Outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), scapular upward rotation, and shoulder passive range of motion conducted at baseline, after 1 session, 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS: Both groups improved significantly after 6 and 12 weeks in pain, disability ( = 0.01 for both; d = 1.53 and 1.46, respectively), scapular upward rotation, shoulder flexion ( = 0.02 for both; d = 2.2 and 0.92, respectively), abduction ( = 0.04; d = 0.07), and external rotation ( = 0.03; d = 0.7). However, CG showed no significant improvement in pain or disability after one session ( = 0.14 and  = 0.16, respectively; d = 0.46 for both). Between groups, results favored EG significantly in pain, disability, scapular upward rotation, shoulder flexion, and abduction ( = 0.02,  = 0.01,  = 0.02,  = 0.05, and  = 0.04, respectively) at 6 weeks (d = 0.81, d = 0.87, d = 0.67, d = 0.64, and d = 0.69, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that adding TSM yielded superior clinical benefits when compared to physical therapy interventions in AC patients. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge a specific limitation in our study is the omission of passive internal rotation assessment. This aspect represents a notable constraint in our research.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: Pan African clinical trial registry "".

ElMelhat, A. M., A. E. Khatib, A. S. A. Youssef, M. R. Zebdawi, S. M. Abdelhamid, hamada ahmed hamada, and R. L. Abbas, "Influence of Changing Hip Position on Electromyographic Activities of Selected Trunk Muscles During Bridging Exercises in Healthy Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study.", Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, vol. 47, issue 1-4, pp. 12-21, 2024 Jan-Jun. Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how rectus abdominis, external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), erector spinae, multifidus (MF), and gluteus maximus (GMax) muscle activities change with different hip positions during back and side bridging exercises.

METHODS: Thirty-six healthy individuals participated in this cross-sectional study and performed 6 exercises including back bridging (BB) in neutral hip position, BB with internal rotation, BB with external rotation (BB + ER), side bridging with hips in neutral (SB), side bridging with hips in flexion (SB + HF), and side bridging with hips in extension (SB + HE). Muscle activity was observed using surface electromyography, normalized using maximum voluntary isometric contraction. Repeated-measures 1-way analysis of variance compared muscle readings for each position.

RESULTS: Back bridging with internal rotation showed significant differences in EO (P = .01) and IO (P < .001) compared with other BB positions. Multifidus and GMax differed significantly in BB + ER (P = .04). Side bridging exhibited significant differences in EO (P = .02; P < .001) and IO (P < .001) compared with the other 2 SB positions, with peak in SB + HF. Erector spinae, MF, and GMax also differed significantly (P < .001, P = .02, P < .001, respectively) with peak in SB + HE.

CONCLUSION: The findings revealed that EO and IO muscles were most active during BB with internal rotation, whereas the MF and GMax muscles were most active during BB + ER. In terms of SB, the EO and IO muscles were most active with either SB + HF or SB + HE, whereas the erector spinae, MF, and GMax muscles were most active with SB + HE.

ElMelhat, A. M., A. S. A. Youssef, M. R. Zebdawi, M. A. Hafez, L. H. Khalil, and D. E. Harrison, "Non-Surgical Approaches to the Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated with Radiculopathy: A Narrative Review.", Journal of clinical medicine, vol. 13, issue 4, 2024 Feb 08. Abstract

Lumbar disc herniation associated with radiculopathy (LDHR) is among the most frequent causes of spine-related disorders. This condition is triggered by irritation of the nerve root caused by a herniated disc. Many non-surgical and surgical approaches are available for managing this prevalent disorder. Non-surgical treatment approaches are considered the preferred initial management methods as they are proven to be efficient in reducing both pain and disability in the absence of any red flags. The methodology employed in this review involves an extensive exploration of recent clinical research, focusing on various non-surgical approaches for LDHR. By exploring the effectiveness and patient-related outcomes of various conservative approaches, including physical therapy modalities and alternative therapies, therapists gain valuable insights that can inform clinical decision-making, ultimately contributing to enhanced patient care and improved outcomes in the treatment of LDHR. The objective of this article is to introduce advanced and new treatment techniques, supplementing existing knowledge on various conservative treatments. It provides a comprehensive overview of the current therapeutic landscape, thereby suggesting pathways for future research to fill the gaps in knowledge. Specific to our detailed review, we identified the following interventions to yield moderate evidence (Level B) of effectiveness for the conservative treatment of LDHR: patient education and self-management, McKenzie method, mobilization and manipulation, exercise therapy, traction (short-term outcomes), neural mobilization, and epidural injections. Two interventions were identified to have weak evidence of effectiveness (Level C): traction for long-term outcomes and dry needling. Three interventions were identified to have conflicting or no evidence (Level D) of effectiveness: electro-diagnostic-based management, laser and ultrasound, and electrotherapy.

ElMelhat, A. M., R. L. Abbas, M. R. Zebdawi, and ali mohamed ali ismail, "Effect of adding thoracic manipulation for the management of patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized clinical trial", Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 2024.
ElMelhat, A. M., K. A. Shalash, A. E. A. Chabara, A. H. Azzam, and N. A. Mohamed, "Identifying female responders to proximal control exercises in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A clinical prediction rule", Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, vol. 17, issue 6, pp. 954-961, 2022. 2-journal_of_taibah_university_medical_sciences.pdf
Youssef, A. S. A., I. M. Moustafa, A. E. M. Melhat, X. Huang, P. A. Oakley, and D. E. Harrison, "Randomized Feasibility Pilot Trial of Adding a New Three-Dimensional Adjustable Posture-Corrective Orthotic to a Multi-Modal Program for the Treatment of Nonspecific Neck Pain", J. Clin. Med, vol. 11, pp. 7028, 2024. 1-jcm-cervical-q1.pdf

Sports physical therapy

Sports physical therapy

Physiotherapy for muscolskeletal disorders